|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Bleb
Grading System
|
|
Please
use the links below to immediately access specific areas of the protocol
|
![]() |
| We
recommend that the images be graded under magnification. Image magnification
to a diagonal length of 15 inches, such as digitally enlarged images on
a screen, would seem appropriate but individual centres are encouraged to
use whatever imaging systems they have available. |
| The
area is given a score of 1-5 depending on its extension 1= 0% (even a small demarcated area, if the value is closest to 0%, as shown.) 2= 25% 3= 50% 4= 75% 5= 100% The number given relates to the area that best describes what is found in the bleb |
| 2a:
The whole, maximal area of the bleb (ie, its peripheral margins) is compared
with
that of the total area visible in the photograph of conjunctiva. The area
is given
a score of 1-5 depending on its extension. 1= 0% 2= 25% 3= 50% 4= 75% 5= 100% The number given relates to the area that best describes what is found in the picture. The area of diffusion can be difficult to detect. The best visual clues are found under magnification and are elevation of the conjunctiva at the limbus forming a shallow limbal gutter. A "boggy" appearance caused by the elevation of the conjunctiva allows the superficial conjunctival vessels to be distinct and the deeper episcleral vessels are less well defined. Reference photographs are given. |